Please review this list of potentially missing .so symlinks.
Owen Taylor
otaylor at redhat.com
Mon Nov 29 15:53:57 UTC 2004
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 21:27 +0000, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > libgmodule-1.2.so
>
> Do you have the glib1.2 development package installed? If so then this
> does indeed look like an oversight.
$ glib-config --libs gmodule
-L/usr/lib -rdynamic -lgmodule -lglib -ldl
$ ls -l /usr/lib/libgmodule.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Oct 27 18:09 /usr/lib/libgmodule.so -> libgmodule-1.2.so.0.0.10
Regards,
Owen
(libglib and libgthread are done the same way, not sure why they didn't
show up in the list but libgmodule did)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20041129/c5845967/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list