Re: RPM specfiles for commercial packages?

[Alan Cox <alan redhat com>]

On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 08:39:36PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> > That assumes you have the right to redistribute the binary and are not
> > just doing internal packaging.  Windows/XP.nosrc.rpm will get me a rude
> > letter and a visit from the boys with truncheons
> 
> Uhh... the norsrc.rpm's do not include the binaries-that-may-not-be-
> redistributed, so what's the problem?

My misunderstanding then. I've seen that used to refer to cases where the
package contains binaries of proprietary code that you don't get src.rpm for