[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: What to do about libc-client (imap)?

From: Kenneth Porter <shiva sewingwitch com>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: What to do about libc-client (imap)?
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:58:04 -0700

--On Sunday, September 19, 2004 6:34 PM -1000 Warren Togami <wtogami redhat com> wrote:

Proposed Option #1: Rename libc-client to imap-libs

Any reason not to call it uwimap-libs? Why should it get premier naming as implementor of IMAP? (I realize it's a reference implementation of the protocol by the protocol's author, but we don't call BIND "dns".)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What to do about libc-client (imap)?
  - From: Matthew Miller
- Re: What to do about libc-client (imap)?
  - From: Jamie Zawinski
- Re: What to do about libc-client (imap)?
  - From: Rex Dieter

References:
- What to do about libc-client (imap)?
  - From: Warren Togami

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]