Re: What to do about libc-client (imap)?

[Joe Orton <jorton redhat com>]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 06:34:06PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Is this really worth more years of headache?  Here are two proposals to 
> deal with this.

I don't think there is strong enough motivation to rename the packages.
If Fedora Extras wishes to maintain an "imap" package then they can do
so without needing to rename libc-client, modulo bug #132928. So I've
built a libc-client package without the "Conflicts: imap" to fix that
bug.

joe