Recent Fedora Core kernels (plus my SPEC file for 2.6.8-1.541 with Athlon support)
Arjan van de Ven
arjanv at redhat.com
Wed Sep 29 06:17:41 UTC 2004
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:44:52AM +0200, Matias Feliciano wrote:
> > > };
> >
> > and how is that not valid ??
> >
>
> I am not a crypto expert but if it's valid key it seems easy to crack.
> No ?
It's actually an empty keyring without keys :)
> So, what is the significant difference between "rpmbuild -bp" and
> kernel-sourcecode: EXTRAVERSION in Makefile.
yep that is something worth fixing
> If we want "rpmbuild -bp" close to the "old" kernel-sourcecode, perhaps
> we should add "BuildPreReq: gtk2-devel, qt-devel" in kernel-2.6.spec .
ew no ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040929/d7a7faa2/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list