rawhide report: 20050405 changes

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:27 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> Here is where we differ. I think cElementTree is a much better XML
> parsing library than libxml2 for use in python. Here's the shoot-out:
> 
> 1. It's faster
> 2. It has a smaller memory footprint
> 3. It follows python conventions
> 4. It results in nicer python code

I think the worst in this thread is to see you guys comparing apples to
oranges, and neither side understanding the issue.

Daniel: they're complaining about the python bindings of libxml2, not
libxml2, cool down.

Guys: don't accuse libxml2 when the problem is the bindings part. You're
creating an automatic "ears-wide-shut" on Daniel by complaining about
libxml2 when you're complaining in fact of another level entirely.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050406/e63c9dca/attachment.sig>