[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora Mini
- From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc: dwmw2 redhat com, zaitcev redhat com
- Subject: Re: Fedora Mini
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:21:52 -0400
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:15:42AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> I am curious if anyone thought about starting some sort of "Small Server"
> fork of Fedora. I figure it's not something that is a pure fantasy,
> considering that Spot manages Aurora all by himself. Come to think of it,
> what forks and derivatives of Fedora do we know?
There have been tools like miniconda. I've been down this path a bit and you
hit a single fundamental near-insoluble problem - up2date/yum/rpm. They burn
resources and need some major rework at the rpm level - work that nobody
afaik is assigned to do (I suspect we are talking full time engineer on
such work).
apt + dpkg on the other hand sucks in lots of other ways but works.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]