gnome-vfs not in Rawhide?

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 à 10:52 -0500, Chris Adams a écrit :
> Once upon a time, John Thacker <thacker at math.cornell.edu> said:
> > I'm biased; my feelings for some time have been "Die, XMMS, Die!"  I like
> > their playlist-based approach much better than Rhythmbox, but their
> > refusal to move away from gtk+ is frustrating.  I get along perfectly
> > well without gtk+, and don't like installing it for just one program.
> 
> Users don't care about the libraries though; it's all about the apps.

Believe me, when using an old lib like gtk+ that directly translates
into "you will only use acsii, else" they _do_ care about the lib
factor.

I still remember the lengths people went to to get a fontconfig-enabled
moz build back when fontconfig was new. And it was "just a library" too.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050407/38ece783/attachment.sig>