i386 devel packages in x86_64 tree (alsa)

[Brian Gerst]

Warren Togami wrote:
> Brian Gerst wrote:
> 
>> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> Orion Poplawski (orion at cora.nwra.com) said:
>>>
>>>> Is there a particular criteria for which i386 devel packages end up the
>>>> in the x86_64 tree? 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Generally, the LSB set. There is discussion of expanding it, but
>>> that will require some work.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>
>> In order to compile wine on x86_64 I had to install the X and openssl 
>> devel packages from the i386 repo.
>>
> 
> You folks might be happier rebuilding i386 SRPMS on your x86_64 by using 
> mock.  It is almost fully automated.
> 
> Warren Togami
> wtogami at redhat.com
> 

I'm not building it through RPM.  Wine has the necessary logic to 
compile as 32-bit even on x86_64.  All that is missing is the symbolic 
links from libfoo.so -> libfoo.so.x for the 32-bit libs, which the i386 
devel packages provide.

--
				Brian Gerst