ATrpms and FC5/RHEL5
John Ellson
ellson at research.att.com
Sat Dec 31 22:56:00 UTC 2005
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
>
>> If so, is there any redhat.com folk that would be willing to add
>> versioned obsoletes/provides to core specfiles? That's neccessary to
>> ensure upgradability.
>
> They (redhat folk) have been receptive to Versioning previously
> non-versioned Obsoletes/Provides in the past when I've requested it on
> several occasions.
>
> However, if you're asking in the context "will they add these simply
> to be compatible/upgradable with ATrpms", then I bet the proposition
> will be less well-received.
>
> -- Rex
>
Please don't make this into a political thing. Axel provides a great
service to the Redhat/Fedora
user community. Lets have a discussion about the technicalities, and
just do it.
Can I assume we're looking for solutions that also help DAG, Dries, Livna ?
John
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list