[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: FC4 slimfast slimfest
- From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- To: Andrew Overholt <overholt redhat com>
- Cc: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: FC4 slimfast slimfest
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:25:08 -0500
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 05:22:00PM -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> I would like to see at least a minimal free Java toolchain/environment in
> Fedora. This is a slippery slope that leads to language-ism, IMHO. Why
> stop with Java? Let's put all python stuff in its own repository as well.
The java stuff is new, its huge and its the easiest to push out for now
> > Not only that but a java repository set has a natural focus and since
> > most of it is in java it can run asynchronously to the OS updates too
>
> Except for the natively-compiled stuff. Plus, I believe Sopwith said this
> kind of 3rd party repository isn't possible ATM.
Then how are we proposing to do Fedora extras ? It is definitely possible.
A Java themed disk may be trickier as a part of base.
If we can't do it then in my opinion its even more critical we keep the current
stuff and java should go into fedora extras or Fedora 5 when the tools are
fixed.
I'd much rather see a Java yum repository and a non-install time java .iso
(which is easy to do as a standalone)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]