[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: FC4 slimfast slimfest
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>
- To: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>, Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>
- Subject: Re: FC4 slimfast slimfest
- Date: 22 Feb 2005 18:33:01 -0300
On Feb 22, 2005, Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva (aoliva redhat com) said:
>> The point that OOo is a very big download offsets the higher costs of
>> bandwidth and slower network connections in most of the world, so you
>> can get an idea of how inconvenient it can be for most of the world to
>> get to extras if it's not available in CDs like the core of the
>> distro.
> Except... Core isn't available on CDs, except from third parties. I
> don't see a reason why Extras couldn't have ISOs made from it
> by those same third parties.
Third parties get the core isos from us. And they can't label it
Fedora if it's not our ISOs. How could they take Fedora Extras and
label it as such, especially if it's not the entire collection?
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]