Exim as default MTA.

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 21:50 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 15:15 +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
>>I think exim still has potential to become our future default MTA.
>
>I agree. We really shouldn't be inflicting sendmail 

What shouldn't be inflicted upon the users is bugware. Exim isn't
particularly famous (in a good way) as far as MTAs go in terms of
security. I would favour postfix, under this POV, but of course if
features is the chosen way, Exim might be your choice.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050222/2e7f6dfb/attachment.sig>