Summary of Dropped Packages

[seth vidal]

>> 
>> Er, do you mean exim-doc, which was split into a separate package? Exim
>> itself is fairly tiny and is a potential candidate for being the default
>> MTA. There was no discussion of removing Exim entirely, and it was
>> shipped in FC3.
>
>For exim I think we should continue to put it into FC-devel, but
>only exclude it from FC4 if the space requirements need this removal.
>
>greetings,

I'm thinking for the future - why don't we consider pulling this
discussion off of fedora-devel and onto fedora-maintainers? Sound
reasonable?

-sv