[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: why doesn't yum cache anything?
- From: Jamie Zawinski <jwz jwz org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: why doesn't yum cache anything?
- Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:09:50 -0800
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>
>> % time rpm -qa '*mtr*' >/dev/null
>> 3.576u 0.121s 0:05.93 62.2% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>> % time yum -C list '*mtr*' >/dev/null
>> 5.474u 0.539s 0:16.41 36.5% 0+0k 0+0io 8pf+0w
>
> No it isn't. When you are doing "rpm -qa" you are only querying the
> database of installed packages. When doing "yum list" you are querying
> installed, AND available packages,
Ok, fair enough, those speeds are almost exactly proportional:
rpm -qa | wc -l => 654
yum -C list '*' | wc -l => 1798
(5.93 / 16.41) / (654.0 / 1798.0) => 0.9934
Is there any kind of reasonable GUI for yum yet? A lot of these
problems wouldn't matter if the "session" was longer, and it was only
doing all of this parsing once at startup, letting you do multiple
queries and installs without it needing to start over from scratch each
time. I thought Ximian Red Carpet was fantastic and I really miss it.
--
Jamie Zawinski jwz jwz org http://www.jwz.org/
jwz dnalounge com http://www.dnalounge.com/
http://jwz.livejournal.com/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]