Re: why doesn't yum cache anything?

From: Jeff Johnson <n3npq nc rr com>
To: icon mricon com, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
Cc:
Subject: Re: why doesn't yum cache anything?
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:20:10 -0500

Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:


so, 3485 packages in 8.2 seconds. By golly, yum is, actually *faster*
then rpm -qa, taking less than twice as long for 5 times as many
packages.

yum is not faster than rpm -qa.

73 de Jeff

References:
- Re: why doesn't yum cache anything?
  - From: Farkas Levente
- Re: why doesn't yum cache anything?
  - From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: why doesn't yum cache anything?
  - From: Jamie Zawinski
- Re: why doesn't yum cache anything?
  - From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: why doesn't yum cache anything?
  - From: Konstantin Ryabitsev