Reopen a request for gpgme in Core
Michael Schwendt
fedora at wir-sind-cool.org
Thu Jan 6 17:30:45 UTC 2005
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:06:59 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Two observations: Where's the patch to be found? And shouldn't you use
> > Sylpheed rather than Evolution? ;)
> >
> Heh heh now that it does gpg signing/verification on my box I might start using
> it :-) Truth to tell, there are some features of Evolution I'm somewhat loathe
> to lose so I might have to bounce between the two mailers for a while depending
> on what I'm doing.
>
> The current version of the patch can be found here:
> http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/sylpheed-gpgme1.0-12.patch
Thanks. I'm going to apply this and also serve as a guinea pig, because
currently I still use a GPGME 0.3.x enabled Sylpheed.
GPGME 1.0 and dependencies are in the fedora.us submission list
already. Bugs: 2178 -> 2179 -> 2180 <- 2185
Among the things to examine are:
* Dependencies on GPGME 0.4.x: gpa, elmo
* Dependencies on GPGME 0.3.x: cryptplug, seahorse, sylpheed-claws
(seahorse is very old, but pcomptom said maybe he will continue it)
* In which way or whether cryptplug uses gpgsm?
* Is cryptplug of any use in FC3?
* How are gpa and elmo affected by an upgrade from gpgme 0.4.x?
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list