[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: further package removals/potential package removals



Jeff Spaleta wrote:
gnome-vfs2-smb package requires samba-common through a library dep
libsmbclient.so.0
However,  nautilus requires gnome-vfs2-smb though an explicit requires
on gnome-vfs2-smb, a decision made by the packager to ensure that the
runtime detectable smb support is always available when nautilus is
installed to provide a perfectly reasonable and recommended default
behavior for the average gnome desktop user.  Some would argue doing
this is bending the purpose of 'requires' field out of necessity  to
be used as a 'suggests' or 'recommends' field which rpm doesn't yet
have support for.

The problem here is that the "recommended default" then becomes a forced necessity. Suddenly, instead of a cool feature, you've got bloat. "Defaults" should be handled by anaconda, not RPM. In the absence of a more elegant way of "recommending" a package other than with a dependancy, the recommendation should simply be left off. If you're going to require an add-on package, then there's really no point to putting it in a separate package anyway. The whole situation is nonsense, really.


But then, this isn't the first time we've had this discussion. However, certain key individuals are convinced that things are fine the way they are, and need no fixing.

Yes, dependacy bloat is a problem, but it's not going to be fixed until the responsible persons are convinced that a problem actually exists.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]