RFC: Soname in rpm name

Féliciano Matias feliciano.matias at free.fr
Mon Jan 24 22:02:02 UTC 2005


Le lundi 24 janvier 2005 à 16:23 -0500, Sean Middleditch a écrit :
> "capabilities equivalent to competing operating systems"... does that
> not include "install stuff" for some reason?
> 
> The Open Source community is pretty good these days about using sonames
> properly.  It's silly to have packages go and break all that effort.
> Sonames exist for a reason.
> 

I replied to "Fedora supposed to be an exercise in speedy RPM rebuilding, or an
operating system?".

I don't have any problem with libthis0, libthis1, libthat0, ...
If this help, I think this can be a good practise.

But it's not the primary focus of Fedora. This does not mean Fedora
should ignore compatibility issue.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050124/0c72a514/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list