On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 10:44 +0100, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
Casper Pedersen wrote:
I think xmms is ugly, no matter what theme you put on it. RhythmBox is at least organized in a nice way.
Depends on how you see it; xmms is nice, small, and might not be pretty, but it works. RythmBox is big and slow to use with very large collections of files, but it is pretty.
Personally, I think xmms looks better. It's plain, but displays what it should and doesn't take a lot of screen estate.
It has awful skins, does not integrate with the rest of the desktop,
and does *not* look better.
it manages to be huge and cluttered while not displaying much)
It's not supposed to be on-screen all the time - you're supposed
to choose what to play and minimize it, or run it in mini mode.
Does xmms let you search? Does it organize by genre? By album? Does it support drag and drop playlist editing?
Radio stations?
Does it minimize in the notification area?
Rhythmbox shouldn't displace better working alternatives until it has gotten useful.
It's a database-backed music player, and cannot be compared to xmms, which is totally different.
It's very useful - I use it all the time.
xmms is the ancient past.
Regards, Dariusz