Eclipse 3.1 (was Re: rawhide report: 20050126 changes)

[Nick Bargnesi]

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:59:10 -0600, Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon at redhat.com> wrote:
> > I'd like to ship a 3.1 M6 (or some stable incremental build between then
> > and FC4 freeze) with FC4 and then update to M7 and 3.1 final as they come
> > out.
> 
> Me too. Because of ...
> 
> >   - awesome new plug-ins like Jeff Pound's ongoing work on the Bugzilla
> >     plug-in are dependent upon 3.1 (without a tonne of back-porting)
> 
> Thing like that, which would make the development life-cycle process in
> eclipse more complete .. and ..
> 
> >   - making RPMs will be much simpler than how we're doing the 3.0.1 now
> 
> Organization of above.
> 
> > I'd like to go with 3.1, but we'll need to do lots of testing and
> > bug-fixing.  The number of gcj/libgcj hackers capable of fixing bugs isn't
> > that high and even getting things down to test cases is not an easy task.
> > I'd like to hear people's opinions.
> 
> I'll help where I can. In porting the plug-ins (CDT, ChangeLog, RPM
> import/export, etc) I expect some cross experience to apply.
> 

Love to help with testing.  I use Eclipse 3.1M4 daily.

> Regards
> 
> Phil
> 
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 


-- 

Nick Bargnesi
http://www.den-4.com
Den 4 Software

pub  1024D/E8BD2FD0 2004-12-02 Nick Bargnesi <nbargnesi at gmail.com>
Key fingerprint = 6F9D 9404 63CD 2B04 DE7A  0F9D A1ED C1B0 E8BD 2FD0
sub  2048g/56C5D45B 2004-12-02

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda