A more efficient up2date service using binary diffs
Joe Desbonnet
joe at galway.net
Wed Mar 9 15:35:17 UTC 2005
From what I can tell nobody is interested in implementing a rpm.diff
system right now (please correct me if I am wrong).
One of the problems raised in earlier threads is that the RPMs need to
be available on the updating computer to apply the patches to.
It is feasible -- if such a system can be demonstrated to work -- to
have the option at install time to keep the RPMs of installed packages
on disk? Sure, there is a disk space penalty -- but for a dialup user
the bandwidth savings would make up for that. Even with my 512Kbps DSL
line I find the OpenOffice upgrades burdensome.
Also having the signed RPMs on disk may have other uses: eg verify the
integrity of an installation (compare files with those in the RPM).
Fix/refresh installation.. etc.
Joe.
On 03 Mar 2005 16:33:56 -0300, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2005, Joe Desbonnet <joe at galway.net> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone thought about improving the up2date service by offering
> > diff files in addition to the .rpm files?
>
> Yup, see mail thread in this very last by the end of January last
> year, and many others :-)
>
> --
> Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
> Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
> Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list