rawhide report: 20050315 changes

Brian Millett bpm at ec-group.com
Tue Mar 15 15:55:45 UTC 2005


On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 07:57 -0500, Build System wrote:
> NetworkManager-0.4-1.cvs20050315.3.0
> ------------------------------------
> * Tue Mar 15 2005 Ray Strode <rstrode at redhat.com> 0.4-1.cvs20050315
> - Pull from latest CVS HEAD (hopefully works again)

No it did not, but I thought, what the heck and did the same.  I just
pulled the latest (03/15/05 9:00 am CST) and tried to compile it for
rawhide, latest (today) updates.

Had to make some cosmetic patches to get it to compile with gcc4 and I
am sure they are "wrong" but it compiled.

[bpm]$ diff -wruN nm-netlink-monitor.c~ nm-netlink-monitor.c
--- nm-netlink-monitor.c~       2005-03-14 23:30:14.000000000 -0600
+++ nm-netlink-monitor.c        2005-03-15 09:39:23.000000000 -0600
@@ -568,10 +568,10 @@
                                  NmNetlinkMonitor *monitor)
 {
        GError *error;
-       gchar *received_bytes;
+       gchar *received_bytes="";
        gboolean processing_is_done;
-       gsize num_received_bytes;
-       guint num_bytes_to_process;
+       gsize num_received_bytes=0;
+       guint num_bytes_to_process=0;
        struct nlmsghdr *header;

        if (io_condition == NM_NETLINK_MONITOR_ERROR_CONDITIONS)

did the hokey-pokey configure, automake, dance.  

It works.

:-)  Thanks for the idea.
--
Brian Millett - [ Londo and Sinclair, "A Voice in the Wilderness I"]
"Commander, what will you do if you find anything of value down there?"
'Hmm, the odds of that are pretty small. It's probably just an automated
homing beacon left over from hundreds of years ago.'
"Yes, but if it isn't, will you tell me?"
'No!'
"Just making sure we know where we stand."

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050315/fc9adb3e/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list