xinitrc m0x0Cn and you.
Mike A. Harris
mharris at www.linux.org.uk
Tue Mar 22 14:01:31 UTC 2005
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
>> I'm currently exploring further modularization of the xinitrc
>> package, with the following goals in mind:
>>
>> 1) Maximize modularization of all scripts included, in an effort
>
> ...
>
>> 2) Minimize xinitrc package maintenance via modularization,
>
> ...
>
>> 3) Enable 3rd party window manager rpm packagers to provide
>> drop-in "it works" functionality that integrates with the
>> system without requiring changes to the core of xinitrc.
>
> ...
>
>> While this concept may (or may not) sound like a large task, it
>> is seemingly a very very small and simple task IMHO. I've
>> attached a very small and simple patch to implement a solution
>> to this problem to the following bugzilla report:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=142260
>
>
> I had done the essentially the same thing in a couple months ago:
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122941#c12
> but my suggested patch also removes all switchdesk references, and
> hard-coded references to gnome/kde (as well as gdm/kdm).
Hmm, yes "Xclients.d" might be a better name for the directory than
Xsession.d is. The same script could be used both for *dm startup
and startx presumeably.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list