"use register arguments" option enabled.

Arjan van de Ven arjanv at redhat.com
Tue May 17 08:07:40 UTC 2005


On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 19:29 +1200, Mike Honeyfield wrote:
> On 5/17/05, Arjan van de Ven <arjanv at redhat.com> wrote:

> > This only impacts binary modules, and in the process of porting
those to
> > 2.6 the vendor needs to "fix" this up just as well. That is the same
for
> > FC and RHEL.
> > 
> 
> So you disagree that this is actually "experimental" as per the kernel
config? 

yes I do.
EXPERIMENTAL in the kernel config in practice is meaningless; it hardly
ever gets removed even after years of high production use of stuff. I
wonder if the EXPERIMENTAL got removed from EXT3 yet .. ;)

> Yes, RH's choice in kernel configure option is theirs and yes, it is
> true, binary only vendor can "fix" (not sure waht the quotes imply),
> we have "fixed" our drivers. Worth noting, our driver was written for
> 2.6 and in RHEL it was broken, but not other platforms we support,
> like debian and suse.

I assume that since your driver was written with linux in mind, that it
is gpl, right? So then you wouldn't have this problem....
(if it's not, make sure your lawyers have read the COPYING.modules file
from the kernel rpms)


> However, I was curious because it seemed ironic to possibly break ABI
> for binary only vendors in the enterprise product.

The linux kernel has no ABI. So it's also not possible to break it. SLES
uses this option too afaik, and it has been there for a long time in
2.6, any driver not capable of running with it is of course very buggy
or at least not adjusted to 2.6 properly.





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050517/5cf77628/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list