On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 05:33:16PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 22:53 +0100, Florian La Roche wrote: > > > no, I don't want to hear any bitching and moaning about this, that's how > > > it is. > > > > At some point we should change this to only pull in as few packages as > > really needed, but that also comes with quite some calculation cost. > > why isn't the way it's currently being done correct? We've gone round > and round on this and its always come down to how to handle globs of > commands. Sometimes less is more. Why should a system be polluted with i386 packages, if the user does not need them? > > This should really be something where yum, up2date and smart algorithms > > should work together and then implement the best solution available. > > is up2date much of a concern anymore? Is something scheduled as replacement for RHEL or XMLRPC? If there is no XMLRPC support in any other depsolver up2date cannot die. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpHSvQvEN5cq.pgp
Description: PGP signature