Modern Update System
Pete Zaitcev
zaitcev at redhat.com
Tue Nov 29 03:23:40 UTC 2005
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:55:11 -0500, David Hollis <dhollis at davehollis.com> wrote:
> I think there is a project that does this, and has been doing it for
> quite awhile. It's called Microsoft Windows. The problem that this
> method poses is that it's very easy to get to a point where you have no
> idea what the current real state of your system is. [...]
Solaris used to have a similar system, where they had subpackages or
"patch" packages. IIRC, they got rid of it and switched to essentially
what we have now, for a few reasons.
- These fragments always grew and congealed together, which only
worsened the first problem; also the savings disappeared over the
life of the package. It was called "jumbo" patch. In a couple of
patch cycles you would be patching whole package anyway. At that
point, it's better to install update packages.
- People were making mistakes installing patches and causing all
sorts of weirdest problems, and it was a living hell for support
-- Mind though, that was a decade before yum.
I am quite surprised that it works for Microsoft, because Sun gave it
a good try. Maybe they just ignore most problems, like what happens
when you upgrade a well-patched system to the next release.
-- Pete
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list