fc5 goals
Michael A. Peters
mpeters at mac.com
Tue Nov 29 14:46:59 UTC 2005
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 14:24 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 2005/11/29, Michael A. Peters <mpeters at mac.com>:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:44 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 14:15 -0800, Jesse Keating a écrit :
> > >
> > > > The question is why are these pieces of software in Fedora CORE vs
> > > > Fedora EXTRAS. I don't think anybody is complaining that the software
> > > > is a part of the Fedora Project itself, just where they should land.
> > > > Core or Extras.
> > >
> > > Actually I for example don't use KDE, and don't care if it's in core or
> > > extras.
> > >
> > > What I do care about is Gnome depending on arts.
> >
> > Unless it has changed - the only reason Gnome depends upon arts is one
> > single gstreamer plugin.
> >
> > I filed an RFE to have it split into a separate package awhile ago (I
> > think pre FC3) and was told it wasn't worth it - even though without
> > that plugin, I wouldn't need either arts or qt (both of which I never
> > use)
>
> whats the bugzilla id? this sounds like "definitely worth it" to me.
Whoa - first time ever I have found a closed bug I looked for on the
first search.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135841
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list