Re: Fedora Bounties (seeking ideas)

[Nils Philippsen <nphilipp redhat com>]

On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 13:26 -0300, Avi Alkalay wrote:
> >From the Bounties page:
> 
> -----------------------
> System G-Conf (or other configuration) backend
> 
> Currently, NetworkManager relies on talking to the session GConf
> daemon for configuration. With some of these other interface types, a
> configuration store is needed that would be available even when no
> user session is initialized.
> -----------------------
> 
> I'd like to propose Elektra as this other system-wide configuration backend.
> GConf, in its essence, was not designed to be system wide. It actually
> has too much dependencies for that.
> 
> More info here:
> http://www.libelektra.org/
> http://www.libelektra.org/GConf

Oh please ... let's ... not ... start ... that ... discussion ... again!

Every argument for and against either GConf or Elektra has been brought
forth already, nothing to see here, move along.

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp redhat com
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011