Attention kernel module project packagers!

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:06:43PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> 
> Leszek Matok schrieb:
> >Dnia 15-08-2006, wto o godzinie 09:27 -0400, Jesse Keating napisał(a):
> >>(...) all kinds of weird hacks to how they are (...)
> >>Arguing over which ugly ass hack to apply to be able to package kernel 
> >>modules is a bikeshed argument.
> >[...]
> >So, kmdls are the next step.
> 
> Kernel-Module packaging is already working, defined, agreed on by FESCo 
> and used in Fedora Extras. See
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/5/i386/kmod-em8300-0.15.3-6.2.6.17_1.2157_FC5.i586.rpm
> for example. The same scheme is used in lvn -- nobody reported problems 
> with it there.

I'm reproting problems and I wrote a ton of information about the
problems. Don't I count?

> But Axel thinks the scheme FESCo invented (in round about half a year of 
> work) is broken and he thinks his scheme is better.

Is that wrong to think? And I'm trying to get better tools in the
hands of Fedora developers. Is that wrong, too?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060815/0c9e3e39/attachment.sig>