bluetooth in default desktop install?

[Sam Folk-Williams]

On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 12:39 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Monday 28 August 2006 12:30, Sam Folk-Williams wrote:
> > IMHO, a lot of users will assume it /can't/ work if it doesn't work out
> > of the box, before they figure out that they need to install the
> > packages...
> 
> By this logic, we should do everything installs by default...
> 
Heh... that's not how I meant my logic to work. I'm referring
specifically to auto-detecting hardware. Not too long ago, if I plugged
in my USB camera, for example, nothing would happen. Last night I was
thrilled that performing this action resulted in a pop-up that said
something like "Digital Camera Detected, would you like to import these
photos?". If that had not occurred, I would have assumed that this kind
of functionality still didn't exist for us in Fedora. 

Having something like this work goes a long way towards swaying people
who assume that this kind of thing just doesn't work in linux. I would
not equate this kind of thing with installing every possible package by
default.

By the way, what HAPPENED to the everything install option!!!! :-)
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- 
Sam Folk-Williams, RHCE         Red Hat Global Support Services 
Phone: 919/754-4558             GPG ID: 1B0D46BA 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060828/5cac1ca2/attachment.sig>