nothing from buildsys?
Bill Rugolsky Jr.
brugolsky at telemetry-investments.com
Tue Feb 7 19:19:30 UTC 2006
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:36:52AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> As a total side-question though, just for personal curiousity...
>
> 1) How many people actually download the SRPMS disk images?
I routinely download the SRPMS, though I grab them from the SRPMS/
directories on the servers. Not much interest in the disk images,
since after a few weeks there are dozens if not hundreds of updates.
> 2) How many people actually really use them for anything?
I keep SRPMS for several reasons:
o Local modifications
I routinely patch:
kernel
grub
SysVinit
initscripts
util-linux
openssh
iptables
iproute
ulogd
nfs-utils
patch
xterm
vnc
quagga
xpdf
mdadm
postgresql
pgadmin3
valgrind
gnumeric
gaim
...
o Creating compat-* packages. I've been saving the various
Red Hat compat-*.src.rpm for many years, and when necessary,
rolling my own.
When we roll forward to a new distribution, we (re-)build
compat-* versions of various tools and libraries. I've got
vendor object-code interface libraries from RH6.2 and RH7.3. :-(
SO, e.g., I coaxed compat-gcc-7.3-2.96.126.src.rpm into building
on FC4/FC5t2.
o Locally-maintained packages.
As some packages have been removed from RH/FC, we have had to
maintain them locally. I recently convinced the RHAS 2.1
metamail to build on FC4/FC5t2 x86_64, using patches taken from
the original RH package, SuSE, PLD, and local modifications.
Also, it's not always the case that newer is better ...
Regards,
Bill Rugolsky
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list