Re: ATrpms and FC5/RHEL5

[Florin Andrei <florin andrei myip org>]

On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 20:50 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> So, is there interest to have ATrpms for FC5 less overlapping with
> core packages?

ATrpms is a great repository, but my perpetual pet peeve is that it
replaces and messes with way too many packages in the distribution. If
that's the overlapping that you refer to, I'd be glad to see it reduced.

I very much prefer the model of Extras and Livna, which don't replace
anything, just add things.

-- 
Florin Andrei

http://florin.myip.org/