On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:41:38PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thats pretty vague. Benchmarks, reproducible regressions, specific bug
reports etc is the way to move forward with this.
Yes, I know. Working on that. One thing I have established is that Clearlooks
is significantly slower than bluecurce (although I can not say whether
FC4-CL is faster/slower than RC-CL right now).
My other gripe is Xv performance, I am writing a benchmark to get to the
bottom of that one.
For fun, here are some gtkperf numbers for current RH, RH default theme
(mainly CL, I think) vs. bluecurve. Machine is a PII400, Number Nine T2R
(yay!). 100 gtkperf iterations. The Pixbufs numbers are bogus, ignore.