[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Size optimization (WAS: Re: FORTIFY_SOURCE for the kernel)
- From: David Nielsen <gnomeuser gmail com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Size optimization (WAS: Re: FORTIFY_SOURCE for the kernel)
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:15:26 +0100
man, 23 01 2006 kl. 10:57 -0800, skrev Toshio Kuratomi:
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 19:31 +0100, David Nielsen wrote:
> > man, 23 01 2006 kl. 18:59 +0100, skrev Ralf Corsepius:
> >
> > > I guess you have benchmarking code to prove this claim to upstream? ;)
> >
> > Well you're in luck some already did, I found this research paper a
> > while back - I took the liberty of putting it on my website hopefully
> > I'm not in violation of anything by doing so.
> >
> > www.lovesunix.net/spaceoptimization.pdf
> >
> > I hope that provides a bit of usable data, at least we could use the
> > methodology to repeated the test for the FC6 cycle.
>
> Interesting read. The big unanswered question seems to be: how does
> this affect the performance of a running application? Does mozilla take
> longer or shorter amounts of time to run once the application loads? Do
> smaller apps benefit less from the optimizations than larger ones?
>
> Could dogtail be used to give predictable "user input" to GUI
> applications or is the speed variable there as well?
I assume a clever combination of systemtap and dogtail might could give
us a good automated tool for testing a few common scenerios - we just
need someone clever to write it.
So who wants a thankless job that's probably both hard and prone to
causing methodology flamewars?
- David
--
Obligatory shameless blog plug - The GNOME commentary located at
www.lovesunix.net/blog
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]