[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20060121 changes



On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 11:56 +1030, n0dalus wrote:
> 
> I think I would prefer the latter. 

While I don't discount your opinion, this has been discussed ad naseum.
The end result of this discussion is that yum will not change the way it
deals with broken deps.  However this does not stop somebody from
developing a yum plugin that will work around this and ask the user if
they wish to install anyway, working around the package tree(s) that are
broken.  That is something that could go into Fedora Extras.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]