[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RPM groups and comps groups, was: FC5T2 ready for even a test release?



On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 10:28 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:

> Some of us, are working with the maintainers to identify which
> packages are not incorporated into the comps grouping structure

Maybe an RPM package's group should match the (default/primary) comps
group of that package. That way we theoretically could have a
"comps-merge" tool which would update comps with new packages,
automatically sorting them into their respective default/primary groups
(perhaps marking them as "fuzzy" just to overstretch the gettext
analogy ;-).

> correctly so that the functionality of the install all button will
> essentially be duplicate by selecting all displayed packages in all
> displayed groups during the install process.  However since you aren't
> interested in anything but the single button solution, and aren't
> interested in helping with the comps membership organization( which
> also has value during post-install for finding and removing
> applications) I won't invite you to help with
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174244.

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp redhat com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]