[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: UnleashKDE
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: UnleashKDE
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:01:29 -0400
Rex Dieter (rdieter math unl edu) said:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
> >> What about the plan to push KDE into extra? has it been finalized yet?
>
> > The "plan" is simply a proposal, and certainly nothing has been finalized.
>
> See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnleashKDE
>
> > it's going to be a piecemeal process... e.g. qt4,kdetoys are (already) in
> > Extras.
>
> Speaking of which, IMO, here's a list of kde bits that are very
> Extras-worthy:
> kdeaddons
> kdeadmin
> kdeartwork (since xscreensaver -> Extras)
> kdebindings
> kdeedu
> kdegames
> kdeutils
> kdewebdev
>
> 2nd tier bits:
> kdegraphics
> kdemultimedia
> kdenetwork
> kdepim
> kdesdk
> kdevelop
>
> lastly, core/esential bits:
> kdebase
> kdelibs
>
> and if you're *really* wild: (doubt this will ever happen)
> qt(3.3.x)
Are these all distinct dependency-wise? How does it improve the
value proposition to have bits in extras, as opposed to the whole
thing?
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]