[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Future Fedora Development



On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:00:26AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Yeah, I agree.  OpenSSL seems to be the most comprehensive, but
> its licence stinks and this is why gnutls was written in the first
> place.  Now that Mozilla adopted the triple MPL/GPL/LGPL license,
> there's no reason to keep gnutls any more.

GNUtls is needed for GPL programs using SSL.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]