rawhide report: 20060524 changes

[Tomasz Kłoczko]

Dnia 24-05-2006, śro o godzinie 12:37 -0400, Bill Nottingham napisał(a):
[..]
> It was linked statically. Static glib libs went away, so....

OK. Next round .. why have (literaly) *one* binary (ppp-watch) which
uses now shared libglib must affect glib ?
Is not better rewrite this tool for not use glib ? or what so big
performs ppp-watch where using glib is neccessary ? is it realy so hard
rewrite this for not use glib ?

kloczek
PS. remember: fixing some bad things by introduce some way less ass pain
way is *most* worse way of development :>
Better is rest this kind things in current form and add them to TODO
list.