[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Buildrequire: perl-XML-Parser (Was: Re: rawhide report: 20060531 changes)
- From: Nils Philippsen <nphilipp redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Buildrequire: perl-XML-Parser (Was: Re: rawhide report: 20060531 changes)
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:56:54 +0200
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 14:20 +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Dnia 31-05-2006, śro o godzinie 03:52 -0400, Build System napisał(a):
> [..]
> > gnome-keyring-manager-2.14.0-2
> > ------------------------------
> > * Mon May 29 2006 Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> - 2.14.0-2
> > - buildrequire gettext and perl-XML-Parser
>
> *All* this kind changes are incorrect.
> BuildRequires for perl-XML-Parser must be replaced by intltool because
> for exaple gnome-keyring-manager build automation do not uses directly
> perl-XML-Parser but intltool and intltool uses perl-XML-Parser (yess
> inltool acelocal macro display messages about looking for
> perl-XML-Parser but it dosent matter).
>
> Intltool must have Require not gettext but gettext-devel. IIRC Requires
> rule for neccessary perl modules from perl-XML-Parser is autogenerated
> so adding explicite in intltool spec Require rule for perl-XML-Parser
> isn't neccessary.
Objection. I also have a package concerned by this (hwbrowser) and it
(by itself) contains intltool scripts (no external dependency on
intltool) which require perl-XML-Parser. Therefore this package requires
"perl-XML-Parser" for building. Note that with packages using an
external intltool YMMV.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp redhat com
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]