Re: vncserver in future dists

[Adam Tkac <atkac redhat com>]

On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:47 +0000, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:25 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > The Xorg server is perfectly capable of running headless, just configure 
> > it to use the dummy driver.
> 
> I think the point is that VNC users are used to having a single 'Xvnc'
> binary they can run, which is a bit like Xvfb but you can connect a VNC
> viewer to it.
> 
> As far as I can tell, this isn't trivial with x11vnc (but maybe I'm
> reading the FAQ incorrectly).
> 
> Tim.
> */

Yes, I've checked that x11vnc isn't good choice. I want discuss idea
that Xvnc won't be big single binary package like now. They're many ways
how it could be done and I want find the best way (performance and
maintaining aspects). I think, vncserver isn't xserver but only
"moderator" between vncviewer and xserver (virtual or psychical)