I think, rsh is quite obsolete
Dave Jones
davej at redhat.com
Thu Nov 9 02:33:47 UTC 2006
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:02:12PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> said:
> > But for Fedora, I can't think of a valid reason why someone would want
> > to enable a telnetd given the security concerns of non encrypted sessions.
>
> For some setups, encryption is not a concern. Besides, FTP, POP3, IMAP,
> etc. are still included.
These can be wrapped with SSL.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list