I think, rsh is quite obsolete

Dave Jones davej at redhat.com
Thu Nov 9 02:33:47 UTC 2006


On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:02:12PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
 > Once upon a time, Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> said:
 > > But for Fedora, I can't think of a valid reason why someone would want
 > > to enable a telnetd given the security concerns of non encrypted sessions.
 > 
 > For some setups, encryption is not a concern.  Besides, FTP, POP3, IMAP,
 > etc. are still included.

These can be wrapped with SSL.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list