Re: Can we make readahead more robust to package updates?

[Arjan van de Ven <arjan fenrus demon nl>]

On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 22:23 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven (arjan fenrus demon nl) said: 
> > I really like this idea; it's a simple "cat" and it can be done at a
> > time where latency doesn't matter... (even in cron.daily)
> > 
> > Oh... this opens more options. This also allows the "sort by
> > blocknumber" to be done at this point and taken out of the critical
> > latency part......
> > 
> > great idea!
> 
> Of course, that then makes shutdown take twice as long.

if you do it at shutdown, which is again a latency path :)
cron.daily/weekly is less so ;)