[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: unowned directory problem with /etc/logrotate.d
- From: Orion Poplawski <orion cora nwra com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Cc: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: unowned directory problem with /etc/logrotate.d
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:54:18 -0700
Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
So since we're already discussing this, what if all packages that put
stuff in logrotate.d, do so from a sub-package... httpd-logrotate (or
something)... The -logrotate sub packages should require logrotate and
of-course the main package (httpd in this case). Users can remove
logrotate and with it, all the -logrotate subpackages from cups, httpd
and the rest, but the software will still install and run just fine.
This method has the added benefit of giving us a cleaner way to provide
log-management for everything, based on an entirely different
log-management tool. Put <XXrotatelogsXX> in extras and provide a
http-<XXrotatelogsXX> package and all is good.
Interesting idea, but the problem is that you would want the -logrotate
packages installed by default to prevent the normal use case from
filling /var, and I'm not sure this is possible at the moment.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion cora nwra com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]