mono vs exec-shield
Dave Jones
davej at redhat.com
Fri Oct 20 20:14:31 UTC 2006
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:49:09AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 12:37 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Alexander Larsson (alexl at redhat.com) said:
> > > Further information from the reporter seems to say that it only affects
> > > xen kernels (dom0), on all cpu:s but opterons. Very strange stuff.
> >
> > ... including x64? Or is it just on 32-bit?
>
> >From the bug:
>
> Opteron box, x86_64 kernel 2.6.18-2798, x86_64 mono 1.1.17-3: works
> Opteron box, x86_64 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, x86_64 mono 1.1.17-3: works
> Opteron box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: works
> Opteron box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: works
> EM64T box, x86_64 kernel 2.6.18-2798, x86_64 mono 1.1.17-3: works
> EM64T box, x86_64 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, x86_64 mono 1.1.17-3: works
> EM64T box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: works
> EM64T box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: SEGFAULT
> Athlon box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: SEGFAULT
> Pentium 4 box, i686 kernel 2.6.18-2798xen, i686 mono 1.1.17-3: SEGFAULT
Sounds more like a Xen bug than an execshield bug.
File a bz against kernel-xen.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list