[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging into /srv? (was: FHS Compliance?)
- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org>
- To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora Extras <fedora-packaging redhat com>, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging into /srv? (was: FHS Compliance?)
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:27:06 -0400
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:11:57PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> FHS says both that we must not impose any particular directory structure
> within /srv, and that we must use /srv as the "default location" for
> storing data used by services. The only way to satisfy that would be to
> do the equivalent of "DocumentRoot /srv" for every service, which would
> be simply stupid.
It doesn't say you must not have any particular defaults in srv -- just that
applications must not expect it to be in any particular way. That's very
different. I think it's entirely reasonable for Fedora to have a default
layout, but it needs to be sure to cope properly if the local system does
something different.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm mattdm org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]