[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging into /srv? (was: FHS Compliance?)
- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas mailhot laposte net>
- To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora Extras <fedora-packaging redhat com>
- Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging into /srv? (was: FHS Compliance?)
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:15:48 +0200
Le lundi 23 octobre 2006 à 12:27 -0400, Matthew Miller a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:11:57PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > FHS says both that we must not impose any particular directory structure
> > within /srv, and that we must use /srv as the "default location" for
> > storing data used by services. The only way to satisfy that would be to
> > do the equivalent of "DocumentRoot /srv" for every service, which would
> > be simply stupid.
>
> It doesn't say you must not have any particular defaults in srv -- just that
> applications must not expect it to be in any particular way.
Replace applications there by third-party applications
Obviously Fedora-packaged apps can expect whatever Fedora layout Fedora
provides.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]