i386 junk on x86_64 default install
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Oct 26 03:01:56 UTC 2006
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 22:49, Michel Salim wrote:
> Having 32-bit libraries makes sense, for the purpose of running legacy
> closed-source applications. Having i386 -devel packages... does not.
> What's the point, without a 32-bit compiler to go along?
The point is to be able to develop 32bit applications. 64bit gcc can create
32 bit binaries. -m32.
>
> And then there are the i386 applications: firefox, gaim, etc. These
> get installed by default (there's no way I can see to exclude i386
> packages short of using kickstart). Removing them should be
> straightforward, right? Just yum --remove glibc.i686. But it's not
> that simple:
These are showing up because they have a -devel subpackage, and the -devel
subpackage is what we key off of to make it multilib. -devel requires its
arch specific library (usually main) package.
As far as removing, yum remove \*.i?86
Works for me every time. The only shared files that may get removed are
documents (bug that needs to be fixed but not critical)
> 1. Often times, removing a 32-bit package also removes the files
> shared with the 64-bit sibling.
> 2. With the default FC6 install, I get a circular dependency when
> trying to remove glibc.i686. It never displays the final list of
> affected packages.
Again, try: yum remove \*.i?86
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20061025/97a12f0a/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list