[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: FC5 "rpmbuild -ta" problems
- From: "Marcio Oliveira" <oliveiram gmail com>
- To: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core" <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: FC5 "rpmbuild -ta" problems
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:31:36 -0300
Dave,
I tested your script in my FC5 and got the following results:
Package tested: rpm-build-4.4.2-15.2 (FC5 original package)
Result: If RH bug 206841 is present, expect to see a series of error lines complaining about missing fields
**** Start of rpmbuild log ****
error: Name field must be present in package: (main package)
error: Version field must be present in package: (main package)
error: Release field must be present in package: (main package)
error: Summary field must be present in package: (main package)
error: Group field must be present in package: (main package)
error: License field must be present in package: (main package)
Package tested:
rpm-build-4.4.2-15.2 (patched)
Result: success
Wrote: /tmp/tmp.dZYmu16297/rpmbuild/SRPMS/foobarbaz-1.0-1.src.rpm
Wrote: /tmp/tmp.dZYmu16297/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/foobarbaz-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
After patch the rpm-build I build lots of rpm packages from tarball packages, and all of them are working fine in my system.
According to the tar command errors from FC5 original rpm-build package, tar command expects to receive "--wildcards" as a parameter (to accept the "*" character in "file to stract" field), and "xOvf" parameters plus a "-" (-xOvf) to extract the file. That is what I added to
rpm-4.2.2/build.c file.
Do you think this problem is a rpmbuild "wrong parameters problem" or a tar "expected parameters problem"?
Thanks for the info.
Márcio
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]